The Philosophy of Monopoly
Thiel’s worldview is built on a rejection of the foundational myths of capitalism and democracy. While most business leaders preach the virtues of the free market, Thiel famously argued in his manifesto Zero to One that “competition is for losers.”
Drawing from the French philosopher René Girard and his theory of “mimesis,” Thiel believes that competition is a destructive force where people mimic each other’s desires, leading to conflict and stagnation. True progress, he argues, comes only from “Zero to One” moments—technological singularities that create monopolies.
This philosophy has seamlessly transferred from his portfolio to his politics. Just as he believes successful companies must operate as monarchies rather than democracies to succeed, he appears to view political freedom as an impediment to technological progress. In a 2009 essay, he wrote explicitly, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
The Panopticon Paradox
There is a glaring contradiction at the heart of Thiel’s empire that confuses casual observers. He describes himself as a libertarian—a faction traditionally suspicious of government overreach. Yet, his most significant creation after PayPal is Palantir, a data analytics firm that powers the surveillance apparatus of the CIA, NSA, and ICE.
Thiel’s critics point out that this is not hypocrisy, but a hierarchy of values. Thiel fears chaos more than he fears the state. In his view, the Western world is stagnant and teetering on the brink of collapse. To prevent a descent into apocalyptic disorder, a central power must maintain absolute control.
Palantir acts as the “all-seeing eye” for this state, offering a “God’s eye view” that allows the sovereign to maintain order. It is the technological enforcement of a worldview that values security and competence over privacy and consensus.
The Katechon: Holding Back the Apocalypse
Thiel’s political maneuvering takes on a theological weight when viewed through his fascination with the biblical concept of the Katechon—the “Restrainer” destined to hold back the Antichrist and the end of the world.
Thiel has lectured on this concept, suggesting a messianic self-conception. He appears to view humanity as racing toward a binary outcome: total technological salvation or total apocalyptic ruin. In this framework, the cumbersome processes of democracy—debate, voting, bureaucracy—are fatal distractions. The world, in his view, requires a “Great Founder,” a philosopher-king capable of taking decisive, unilateral action to “restrain” the chaos and force humanity through the bottleneck of the future.
Engineering a Techno-Monarchy
Thiel’s interventions in public life are rarely standard lobbying; they are hostile takeovers of democratic institutions.
- The Media: When he secretly funded a lawsuit to bankrupt Gawker Media, he didn’t just settle a grudge. He established a precedent that a single wealthy individual could unilaterally dismantle a media outlet, effectively bypassing the First Amendment through financial attrition.
-
The State: His backing of Donald Trump in 2016 was viewed by many peers as a hedge against reality. But for Thiel, Trump was a “disruptor”—a necessary shock to the system.
-
The Succession: Perhaps his most successful “product” is Vice President J.D. Vance. A former employee of Thiel’s Mithril Capital, Vance represents the evolution of Thiel’s political technology: the populism of Trump refined by the intellectual rigor of the New Right.
The Future He Wants
Thiel’s ultimate vision is often associated with the “Dark Enlightenment” or neoreactionary thought. It is a future where the “fiction” of equality is abandoned in favor of a formalized hierarchy. In this world, nations are run like corporations, with a CEO-monarch at the helm, accountable not to the voters, but to reality and efficiency.
It is a vision of high-tech feudalism. The masses may have their culture wars and their apps, but the machinery of history—the decisions about war, currency, and technology—will be removed from the public square and placed into the hands of a competent few.
Peter Thiel is betting that the American experiment in self-governance is failing. And with every politician he buys and every surveillance tool he builds, he is doing his best to ensure he wins that bet.
Add comment